The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum - View Single Post

Nogrod · 02-19-2006, 06:54 AM

Just a small add-on to the case 3) of my accusation on Roa

In case she would be irresposible (and an idiot) enough to offer herself as a bait at this hour (for what reason exactly?), she wouldn't be explaining her decision, telling us, that she really meant us to look at her... She's not that stupid!

One could also say, that there is a third option: that she was so reliant on her capabilities of arguing her "real" innocence, and that her case would really be so strong, that looking at the evidence from Folwren would turn out on her favour.
But:
1) There really isn't any evidence in a players post, who has just played the first day - and the beginning of the second one, where practically no-one but she made any comments. I'm quite positive, that Folwren would agree on this. So all this is idle stuff, meant to distract us from the real debate we should have.
2) Her position surely isn't a secure one. You all have seen how she contradicts herself time after time and slips her tongue all the time. It would really be stupid indeed to focus the attention to herself - and to repeat: Roa is not stupid!

So I still believe, that Roa was just trying to cover her earlier mistake - or maybe we should say, her wrong calculations about any-one of us villagers to really start thinking about her webs.

PS1. Still waiting for your theories that are better than this...

PS2. Still waiting for you lot to turn online and to continue discussion...

PS3. Gandalf and Elu: please, please show up!!! The village needs you now!

02-19-2006, 06:54 AM	#157
Nogrod Flame of the Ainulindalë Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Wearing rat's coat, crowskin, crossed staves in a field behaving as the wind behaves Posts: 9,308	Just a small add-on to the case 3) of my accusation on Roa In case she would be irresposible (and an idiot) enough to offer herself as a bait at this hour (for what reason exactly?), she wouldn't be explaining her decision, telling us, that she really meant us to look at her... She's not that stupid! One could also say, that there is a third option: that she was so reliant on her capabilities of arguing her "real" innocence, and that her case would really be so strong, that looking at the evidence from Folwren would turn out on her favour. But: 1) There really isn't any evidence in a players post, who has just played the first day - and the beginning of the second one, where practically no-one but she made any comments. I'm quite positive, that Folwren would agree on this. So all this is idle stuff, meant to distract us from the real debate we should have. 2) Her position surely isn't a secure one. You all have seen how she contradicts herself time after time and slips her tongue all the time. It would really be stupid indeed to focus the attention to herself - and to repeat: Roa is not stupid! So I still believe, that Roa was just trying to cover her earlier mistake - or maybe we should say, her wrong calculations about any-one of us villagers to really start thinking about her webs. PS1. Still waiting for your theories that are better than this... PS2. Still waiting for you lot to turn online and to continue discussion... PS3. Gandalf and Elu: please, please show up!!! The village needs you now! __________________ Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... Last edited by Nogrod; 02-19-2006 at 06:59 AM.