[stone of vision]

The thread

Hail, very nice topic master of puppet (are you a fan of Shirow/ ghost in the shell ?). So Glad to find people so fond of those hobbits dear to my heart. [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]

I amazed by the deep of all the thoughts I’ve read, giving a shed of light on complexity of those characters, and it seems that Sense needn’t waiting for older aging! (oooh I’m so older, but let’s say, like the elves I stop aging in my mid twenties [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img])

Thingol, I appreciate very much your pov as mine(s) are quite closed to yours.

Luthien, and all the hobbits lovers, I found your thoughts and ideas interesting and very refreshing like a new born and cheerful wind blow.

Child, littlemanpoet, Nar, you great thinkers, pleased to hear from you again.

Gimli, symbiote is full of sagacity and true in a certain way.

I would like to talk about the “love triangle”, Frodo/Sam/Gollum; you are so right littlemanpoet, it ‘s very difficult not to think of them as a triad, and I approve Sharon’s comment about the interactivity of each of them as different pairs.

I don’t know if the ring could be considered like the fourth of them. I would rather see it like the link/ the tools/ the mediator/ the motor between the threesome’ s interaction.

I’m striked by the perspicacity of yours, Sharon, to guess so well my thoughts: the light we choose to shed on, depends on the sensitiveness and references each reader have.
I’m sure there are numerous views of the triad’s interaction.

So what I shall post next is only my own interpretation.
Oh my ! I have so much to say, hope I won’t traumatize you with my ramblings [img]smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img]

A bientôt [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]