[the guy who be short]

So why did the village end up lynching Nilp? What evidence was against him, how strong, and where the bandwagons? *Smokes Sherlock pipe*


Cailin is the first to mention Nilp on Day 3, and to offer evidence against him. I'm not too sure I feel this is at all incriminating, as Cailin seems to be experiencing a knee-jerk reaction - Nilp voted for her the day before.

Gurthang then latches onto Cailin's theory.

More or less half the village accuses Nilp at this point, now that the ball is rolling.

Farael is the first to say something to the contrary of puclib opinion, claiming he is "not sold on Nilp".

Nilp forms a list of those he believes innocent, including Rune, Valier, Lhuna and Kuru, whom he is less sure of. Then he thanks Farael for not believing in his guilt - and says to "look to Alcarillo."

... And now I am being whisked away. Sorry, I'm unable to complete this. For the record, I think Valier was killed as she was fairly quiet, offering few leads. I would have been a good choice, had so much guilt not been cast upon me. In any case, if somebody could complete the analysis of Nilp, and analyse both Valier's posts and Alcarillo's (I believe very much in honouring the wishes of the dead), that would be great.