[Kath]

'Safe' votes? Please explain. I voted for those I thought to be guilty, often regardless of the votes that had gone before. I didn't vote yesterday because of bad timing. I got here late and hoped I might have time to get a vote in, but our dear mod said to be quiet just before I managed to. If you want to know who I would have voted for I'll admit that it would have been Saucepan Man because I had been having misgivings about him all day. Of course now we know he's an innocent I'm not really sure what to think. And Wayne innocent too. Did anyone get that rod thing? I thought it was just my screen playing up!

morm, this analysing plan of yours, is that for toDay or the next, because if toDay I will have enough time to do it. The only problem that I see with it though is that if two wolves happen to be next to each other then one wolf will be analysed by another, and so it is possible that they would only pick out statements that made their fellow wolf look guilty. I don't know how that problem could be overcome though since we have no known innocents. If the Hunter or the Ranger revealed themselves (as someone suggested earlier) we would have a known innocent, and if it were only the Hunter then the Ranger could stay hidden and protect the Hunter that night. If that were the case though we would have to decide on who seemed the most suspicious, or who is most likely to be working together, and then put the Hunter in between those two. But then that part would be a bit superfluous as obvioulsy there would be no point in analysing the words of the Hunter if we knew who they were.

So either we leave morm's plan as is and risk a wolf convincing us of another wolf's innocence, we reveal a Gifted or we don't do it. Being as morm would be analysing Lhuna and I'm not too keen on either of them as innocents, I'm not so sure we shouldn't just leave it. If people just analysed those they thought most suspicious it might work better.