Quote:
Fordim: As fond as I am of quantitative methods, I'd hesitate before putting faith in your system. Why? Two reasons:
1. I think it undervalues your point number 1. Wolves will be willing to say anything; it seems to me that their voting is a much more reliable signal.
2. It overvalues your point 4, since it gives up to 5 points for vague "just seeming to act wolfishly" behaviour.
I said earlier that I'm inclined to think Gurthang is the Cobbler, and I remain so inclined. Maybe I'm being obtuse.
I will probably vote fairly late again, as I'll be available until the end of the DAY and I want to stay on top of any new developments. But just to let people know where I stand, I am in favour of lynching either Rune or Wilwarin today. Since few seem to agree about Wilwarin, I will probably end up voting for Rune.
|
Fair 'nuf
Aiwendil m'lad -- in particular your point about voting over voicing, but as yet there's not a lot of the former, and too much of the latter -- but please bear in mind, as I'm not suggesting that this method be
THE Method as everyone uses: I'm just trying to lay out as clearly as I can how I'm thinking for myself. This model will no doubt change in coming DAYS (assuming and hoping, that is, that I lives to see them).
Quote:
|
Fordim 1, 3, 4.2, and 4.5 (4)
|
Fair 'nuf
mormegil me boyo, but so far as I'm using my system 1 and 3 probably can't be combined -- but you can view things as you want to makes up your own mind.