Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gurthang
Well, I don't really say that I agree with much of that. But that's another fish in a larger sea, and really doesn't have much to do with Tolkien.
|
Why not? Tolkien himself created the conceit that the works were translations from other works. So how do we know whether we are reading the view of the translator or the original writer? And how do we know that the original writer was correct in their view of Eru? Arguably we are only seeing the views of the Elves (and they were a huge influence on the Hobbit writers), and how do they know the 'truth' about Eru any more than anyone else in Arda? It reminds me of how school history books in different eras or different countries can address the same 'facts' in different ways. It's all about primary and secondary sources and to what extent they are trusworthy.
I think that Tolkien wisely left the question quite open to interpretation with no definite answer. Yes there are indications which could equate Eru with a Christian God, but equally there are indications that Eru is nothing of the sort. To apply any God from our world to Tolkien's world is applicability, it may even verge upon allegory. Either way, if Eru is not unique to Himself, then this is not a Secondary World.