Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mister Underhill
But just remember that every time you defend one of Jackson's choices based solely on mass-appeal or cite his box office returns as argument-ending proof of his genius, a skwerl dies. Don't be a skwerl-killer.
|
Aw! Whyd'ya have to go and take away all my arguments so early on ...
Seriously, I'm not planning on defending any of Jackson's decisions based
solely on mass-appeal. I'm just saying that it's a factor in his decision-making. And I am keen to make sure that we keep in mind that these films were made for a wider audience than solely pre-existing fans of the books.
Nor am I suggesting that a delayed exposition wouldn't necessarily work. My inclination is that film audiences, particularly today, have less patience than book readers, at least when it comes to setting up the basis for the story. Or, to put it another way, film-makers have less leeway, in terms of timing and audience expectation, than authors. But I'm willing to suspend judgement and see how it works out (if you're willing to follow it through
).
Of course, any suggested alternative structures are unproven, whereas Jackson's decisions
are proven at the box-office ...
*
Hark, is that a skwerl I hear thudding to the ground?*