[Feanor of the Peredhil]

Kind of you, Encai, to heed my begged request.

I suppose there is now no real point for me to "convict" Underhill, however I still intend to toss out a few random comments that I haven't come to grips with.

The most obviously innocent villagers are myself and Esty

Which is such dumb reasoning based on the pure chance of role assignation. They have the same probability of everyone else.

He mentions that we shouldn't trust the ones that consistently vote late, and consistently, he does. In post 302, he was one of the first, if not the first, to point out that TGWBS had some wolfish tendencies. In his next post, he analyzes him. Would we have been as worried about the guy who be dead if he hadn't? I'm not sure.

Originally Posted by Hillo-illo-illo

Cross-posting -- Esty, even though that self-vote by tgwbs raised a big red-flag for me, he was still relatively low on my suspicion list from yesterday. I was rather surprised when morm put him down as the #1-to-be-lynched when he posted his plan in #347-8. If Shorty hadn't of self-voted, or if morm had seemed less certain, I would have at least discussed that choice.

He said this today about how he wasn't that worried about TGWBS until the self-vote and morm's 347 plan, but I was remembering that post 302 when Underhill first pointed out his suspicions.

Quote:
I think Fea almost has to be on the list. If she were an innocent villager, she could have been a lot more helpful; instead, each day has seen her surrounded by confusion and doubt. She makes statements one way, then has to recant or back up her statements with more explanation. She may be innocent after all, but she's on almost everyone's list.
I'd also like to address this: how can one be considered helpful when one is automatically considered a huge threat and not to be trusted? I gave what help I could, offering strategies, tips, suspects, random observations. The only reason that there is confusion and doubt is because you have it. I didn't give it to you. You developed that all on your own. I don't recant and/or back up my statements with bad reasoning. Apparently there isn't a person in the world that is capable of following my line of thought. So I say something that I think is obvious, and then people tell me it isn't, so I have to rephrase. Occasionally I am wrong and have to correct myself. Sorry if admitting to be wrong seems wolfish.

Quote by Underhill:
I was leaning toward an innocent Enca before the "mistake". I'd go for a Shorty-B88 double.
So at this point, he's not thinking that Encai is innocent, and yet he passes up a lynching opportunity in favor of TGWBS?