|
I'm trying to find out where we went wrong yesterDay. In post #292, Fea was still suggesting the double-lynching of Boro and Enca, which I also suggested. So did morm, originally. When did we get off-track, choosing tgwbs?! tgwbs supported the double-lynching of Boro and Enca in post #299.
Then morm backed off the two of them, thinking that the combination wasn't good. It looks to me like it was Boro who, in post #309, started the bandwagon that led to tgwbs' downfall. Three posts later, tgwbs says he's willing to be lynched. Huh??
Underhill then did an analysis of tgwbs that gave the hunt some considerable impetus. However, very soon after that, the guy gave himself up by that suicidal vote. I can't find any wolvish influence in that wrong decision we made - it was a combination of unfortunate incidents, apparently!
It looks to me like tgwbs' rather random votes and failing explanations were merely the way a spontaneous person reacts, a sudden change of mind without the communication of a logical explanation that we others could understand.
__________________
'Mercy!' cried Gandalf. 'If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you. What more do you want to know?' 'The whole history of Middle-earth.. .'
Last edited by Estelyn Telcontar; 10-26-2005 at 01:27 PM.
|