Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Perky Ent
Quote:
|
He is basically saying that, if X is a Wolf, then Y is innocent, but if X is innocent, then Z is a Wolf. Who better to know of the guilt and innocence of X, Y and Z than a Wolf, and what better way to point us in the wrong direction when one of them is killed or lynched than this kind of reasoning?
|
Um...actually I wasn't saying that. That's the logic other people are using to try and figure out the wolves. |
Actually according to how I understand it he was refering to Articstorm's logic.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alcarillo
I'm here! And I say "Lynch somebody whose death would give us the most information". Even if that person turns out to be an innocent, we then know more about what other villagers are likely to be. According to this, we should lynch Perky, right?
|
I agree in that today unless somebody better appears on the radar we ought to lynch the person who gives us the most information. I disagree that it would be
Perky though. I would rather see
Articstorm. If he's guilty I think we can assume the Perky is likely to be guilty too based on the colusion I noted earlier. If Perky is guilty then we can almost assume that
Wilwa,
SpM and I are innocent as well due to our first day voting of
Perky. If
Articstorm is innocent then I will be closely examined and I invite such examination of myself because I truly have nothing to hide. I am admitting that there is a chance that both
Articstorm and I are innocent though I believe
Articstorm is guilty.
My eyebrow has recently been raised to
Márcolië Lamen but not sufficient to go after her today. But I will make it known that I will look more deeply at her in the future. I didn't yesterday because of
Formendacil's random vote, it didn't seem just to go too strongly after her because of that.