Basically my logic is that at least one wolf was probably in each main group of votes. With that in mind, there is a possibility taht Perky is not a wolf because it would be too risky early on for the wolvesto vote the first day for a fellow wolf and have a chance at getting him lynched.
So I looked at who voted for Perky, however if Perky is a wolf, I can pretty much eliminate either Mormegil or Wilwa from being wolves. My entire idea of Morm or Wilwa being wolves hinges on the other one being one and Perky not. SHould any of those things be disproved, both Morm and Wilwa would not be high on my suspicion list for a while. I still beleive that 1 wolf voted for Gil, either Alcarillo, Azalia, or Perky. And while any other arguement I may have hinges on Perky being innocent, I want to beleive him innocent for the time being. But should that be disproven today, I would have to look more closely at those who distanced themselves from him and those who joined late into the vote. I would also look at those who led the vote once it was clear he would die anyway. But I am getting ahead of myself here. Right now, I cannot see anyone connected to Perky, by being close to, or distancing himself from him. But should someone be able to prove me otherwise, that he is, indeed. a wolf, I would join the village in administering justice.
On day 1 it is usually a good strategy for wolves to distance themselves from other wolves, and then vote for someone else entirely. I do not know if this is what happened, but that is one of the things my reasoning is based on.
|