View Single Post
Old 10-02-2005, 12:28 AM   #97
The Perky Ent
Maniacal Mage
 
The Perky Ent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Setting sail for Umbar, with Firefoot at my side!
Posts: 3,297
The Perky Ent has just left Hobbiton.
Send a message via AIM to The Perky Ent
Pipe Worrying is as effective as trying to solve an algebra problem by chewing bubble gum!

Quote:
Originally Posted by morm
If you do not think Gil to be guilty then why vote for him? I realize the voting was close between you two but you never once mentioned that as a reason for you voting. However, if it were a reason and you were a true innocent I believe in this situation a true innocent should still vote for somebody they find guilty, even though it may mean they are lynched. Now if you were gifted then it could be a reason but I don't think you are gifted, I think you are a wolf.
Well, just like in this quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcarillo
Even if he turns out to be innocent, we, as Saucepan Man said, will eventually lynch him; and it's better to lynch an innocent today than later when it matters most for the village
that was partially my reasoning. He was suspicious to me, but I didn't have a strong feeling he was a wolf. I don't think anyone should have a strong feeling who a wolf is on the first day other than A) The seer who could have seen it, or B) reading the villager say 'Ahem! I'm a werewol- I mean, Steward. I'm voting + +BlahBlah (THIS ISN'T MY VOTE FOR TODAY. IT'S AN EXAMPLE) because he thinks I'm a wolf, and I don't want him trying to lynch me so the villagers can find out i'm a wolf'. I didn't have a gut feeling he was innocent, but I was, given his suspicious behavoir, willing to give it a chance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by morm
However, if it were a reason and you were a true innocent I believe in this situation a true innocent should still vote for somebody they find guilty, even though it may mean they are lynched
Well, if we all thought like you, this game wouldn't be interesting, now would it? I did find Gil-Galad to be guilty to some extent, and that is why I voted for him. I didn't say
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gil-Galad
i swear i went eenie weenie miny mo ++Saucepanman


see you sunday
that also seemed suspicious too me. Need any more proof that I enough to go on to lynch Gil-Galad for day one? Mormegil, you seem to try to be throwing us off your tracks, at least from the way I'm reading it. There's nothing more enjoyable than everyone hypothetically call you a werewolf (That's sarcasm, if you didn't realize it)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aber (yes, I know i'm quoting a lot)
In spite of this, I do not not trust Saucepan, because he is too big an asset to the village to lose, but more importantly it just seems a logical step towards weeding out the wolves from the villagers by posting the things that are suspicious.
I don't know if it's necesarily logical, but I do think it is very dangerous to have a big asset to the group. I hate to say every man for himself, but the only ones that can work together are the wolves, and they're working among us. I will certainly not trust anyone unless they specifically say something like "I know I may seem mean at times, but it's the price you pay for me protecting you" which is the person saying they're the ranger (not that they'll last long if they publically declare it). If I were to analize this thread like a math problem, I'd say y'all were using guess-and-check, plugging in different people into problems, picking more for your equation until you find the right one. By this equation, I mean the whole "let's assuming one of the werewolfs voted for Gil. Now let's say it's perky...


Mormegil, I do not have a collusion between Arctic. I'm not sure where you get that from.

__________________
'But Melkor also was there, and he came to the house of Fëanor, and there he slew Finwë King of the Noldor before his doors, and spilled the first blood in the Blessed Realm; for Finwë alone had not fled from the horror of the Dark.'
The Perky Ent is offline   Reply With Quote