The more I consider this [Formendacil's vote] the more it makes sense.
Earlier, Saucepan Man said that he didn't trust those who:
Do not vote or change their minds frequently or without reason.
That's fair enough by my reckoning. But, he also says that he doesn't trust those who:
Do not speak much or make accusations without backing them up with good reasons.
Now fair enough, there's a difference between 'not trusting' and 'having suspicions of'. But I'm not sure I agree with Saucey here. I'd rather trust someone who makes one or two good posts than someone who says a whole lot of nothing. And 'stirring the pot' is absolutely necessary. Whether intentional or not, that's what Formendacil's vote has done (stirred the pot, that is); and I think it could prove to be useful. That is in no way a knock on Márcolië Lamen.
In my opinion, our chief danger is posts of no substance; and I count accusations of any nature to be a substance of sort.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond
|