Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Saucepan Man
Oh, alright davem. You can have the last word ...
Oops!   |
Sorry. I know its come across that way, but I'm not trying to just repeat myself - & I actually think its important...
Look, Tolkien told us what LotR was 'about' on a number of occasions - its a long story meant to entertain, its the story of a hobbit broken down & made into something entirely other (approximation - I'm quoting from memory), etc. Others (the green movement, the far right, etc) have also told us what its about - as far as they're concerned.
So, all these different groups & individuals are claiming a knowledge of what the book is
about, why it speaks to them, what they take from it, etc. My question is, are those things the
same as the
meaning of the book? Is there a difference between 'What the book
means' & 'What the book means to
me?
In other words, is the meaning I find in the book the
only meaning there can be, or does the story
itself mean something - does it have an 'objective' meaning which an individual reader can choose either to accept or reject?
Does there have to be an either' or choice made between the two - or why does one have to take priority over the other?
I'm fumbling around & probably not making much sense here...
EDIT
Let me try & clarify. In Middle earth Eru creates Ea. Its
meaning is the one He gives it - its purpose is what He declares it to be. Yet all his children are free to either accept that meaning, adapt it, or reject it. They can 'find' whatever meaning in it they wish - as they wish. Some, however, will place Eru's meaning & purpose above their own, & even willingly sacrifice their own in favour of His.
Tolkien's position on this is clear - he states that the 'Right' approach for the children is to put
His intention, meaning & purpose before their own - even if they suffer or die as a result.
Can we draw an analogy between Eru & the children & Tolkien & his readers?
Actually, that is probably just confusing things more...