Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SpM
Ah, but HI, the fact that the statement is one with which you agree does not mean that it provides the answer for all of us
|
That's why I
asks, or even
begs, not
states.
I was well aware this was coming, ever since that
Canonicity Slapdown 2005 appeared, my previous was a feeble attempt to keep the low profile. In fact, I'm mildly surprised it took so long for this here mind-trap to emerge to the surface again. I feel I'm being sucked back in... Well, if you are prepared to go 13 pages of this all over again, so be it. I'm ready, bring them on! (but maybe better tomorrow, not just now)
Should we step up our desks, seeing as the discussion turns to dead poets somehow?
Just a minor bone-picking before I fall asleep from my chair:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SpM
I simply do not get this analogy between the act of reading and a conversation. Reading is most unlike a conversation, because the reader is not free to ask the author whatever questions may come to mind and the development (as opposed to meaning) of the story is not dependent upon the reader's responses
|
1. Free questions re: Talking to a person with a large hairy wart on his/her nose, am I free to ask where s/he acquired such an adorment, however curious about the issue I may find myself?
2 Development re: Can I bend conversation to [insert the subject of your choice here], however big my desire, if the person I'm talking to A) was never interested/never heard about [subject of aforesaid choice] in the first place and B) is inclined to talk about flowers in pots?
But that's me being merely peevish, I'll see what the lot of you talk yourself into by morn tomorrow
Hoping to get as much fun out of this later as possible, since there seems no inclination of not tickling sleeping dragons, I say my compliments and withdraw for now...
cheers