[the guy who be short]

I post that I have evidence against Morm. Later, Firefoot says:

Having since gone through the thread again, one thing that I've noticed is that our seer Kitanna seemed quite certain that Morm was a wolf. This may be our best bet for catching a wolf.

She supports me, rather than vice versa, or me trying to piggyback off her.

Originally Posted by Firefoot

I think that we can be quite certain as well that Holbytlass is innocent, else she would not have changed her vote to herself when an innocent was about to die.
We should also be looking at who Durelin's partner the hunter may have been. The more innocents that we can figure on, the better our chances of catching a wolf will be.

I later explore these two points. They're no-brainers though, hardly evidence of mutual support.

Originally Posted by Firefoot

I was coming to some of the same conclusions as TGWBS even as he posted them. I don't think there can be a lot of doubt...

She supports my evidence again, piggybacking off it, if you will. Not vice versa.

Originally Posted by Firefoot

I am starting to wonder whether TGWBS hasn't done a fantastic job of covering his tracks... one more point I left off. TGWBS found it necessary to point out in his very first post that he was "obviously innocent." Hmm...

She accuses me. Hardly the perfect person to piggyback off.

Originally Posted by Firefoot

Also interesting is that both Morm and Kath went onto TGWBS's "probably innocent" list (bottom Page 2).
I'd like to hear from TGWBS... I'm becoming ever more convinced that he may be a wolf

More accusations of me. Perfect person to associate myself with.

Originally Posted by Me

So is everybody, I presume. What is clear is that we cannot make a single mistake from now to the end, or all is lost.

The only "theory" of Firefoot's I piggyback off, if such it can be called. A one line accusation is hardly a theory, and little to piggyback off.


There we go. Done. A one line accusation from Firefoot which I immediately agree with due to, as I later state, independant reasons. Firefoot's accusation hardly deserves the word theory. A non-existant theory cannot be piggybacked off.
Furthermore, I note that you immediately voiced concern about me piggybacking off Firefoot - despite the fact that it was an isolated moment when I agreed with her, and no theorising was present.

Originally Posted by Kath

Now, as to me. Firefoot says she wants to vote for me and has so far been supported by TGWBS. This worries me as I have been having concerns about TGWBS all day. Firefoot's post ealier (or was it yesterday?) about him possibly playing a double bluff gave me pause for thought. And now today he is going along with her ideas with no reasoning off his own. This strikes me as odd. Perhaps he is trying to put her off his trail? Firefoot seems to me trustworthy, maybe he feels that associating with her will keep suspicion away from him.

Indeed. No reasoning of my own. You make it sound as if Firefoot had extensive reasoning as opposed to one line of accusation.

And so, Kath, you give yourself away. You accuse me of piggybacking on the non-existant theories of others. But you voiced this suspicion yesterday, and that shall beyour undoing. Plainly, you killed Firefoot so as to be able to cast suspicion upon me and accuse me, as you have done above, for no reason whatsoever, hoping that others will not look back and realise the lack of evidence behind it.

To me, you have shown plainly that you are a wolf. I would vote right now, but I would be accused of being rash, and I would very much like to see the quiet villagers today.

I will definitely be voting Kath.