[littlemanpoet]

Originally Posted by Feanor of the Peredhil

Now, however... I'm still going to say "LITTLEMANPOET IS A WOLF." He's just too polite of a loudmouth to be sincere. But then again... I'm also suspicious of Lalaith, just for good measure, and I think that The Barrow-Wight and The Saucepan Man and Esty are wolves.

Hardy har har. You are too funny.

Originally Posted by Saurreg

Trends to look out for:

1. Any pattern of same names that have voted for the condemned and the next most suspicious together.

2. The same names appearing much latter during the vote.

This is an interesting theory. What you mean by #1 is unclear to me. If I understand it, it can only be applied to those who have actually voted on both days. I've thought of making a request that those who didn't vote, say how they would have voted, but I realize that the wolves would most certainly make the thing a fantasy at best. So we're stuck with the data available on this thread.

So the only people we can test your trend with, as I said, are those who have voted twice:

Celuien late for Oddwen then early for Oddwen
Firefoot somewhat late for Saurreg then early for Oddwen
Lalaith early for Kath then very late for Oddwen
Feanor of the Peredhil early for Eomer then early for LMP

I personally (on gut instinct mind you) doubt the guilt of any of these four. Based on your second criterion, none of them voted late twice. Based on your first criterion, Celuien was consistent; Firefoot voted according to suspicions as far as I can tell; Lalaith stabbed in the dark then tried to make sure there was no tie and failed;Feanor took two stabs in the dark.

Sorry, but because of the lack of voting the first day, there just isn't enough information. I would tell you how I would have voted on the first day, but you can bet the wolves would just use it against me.