Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Oddwen
What I meant was that I found your "stab-in-the-dark" against me yesterday rather suspicious - if you were an unwiser wolf you doubtless would have gone for Ang or Esgall who were no-shows yesterday, but you went for a side-show instead. Your insistence upon me today seems to point towards wanting folks to think that you don't change horses in the middle of the stream.
Also - if I make it through to tomorrow, things are looking so that I won't be here.
|
Well, if I'm wrong, I truely apologize.
But really, my vote is not a matter of keeping the village from thinking I'm changing horses. I very nearly decided to go for
Saurreg today, but I wanted to see how the theories played out and this seemed like the best way to test it.
To clarify, by not voting for Eomer or Phantom, I needed to pick someone who looked able to snatch away a majority and I thought that a possible no-show who had a vote already and *could* possibly get a majorty would be a better way to try and stop a
phantom,
Eomer,
Oddwen triple-lynching than going for someone unlikely to get any votes. Not a wasted vote by going for someone I thought would die anyway, but a way to put a majority to someone who would die anyway to keep us from losing two villagers instead of one.
I realize I look pretty suspicious now, but I genuinely voted in the way I hoped would help the village most, even if my reasoning turns out to be horribly wrong.