The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum - View Single Post - Lord of the Rings- what a crappy title!

GreyIstar · 12-11-2002, 03:29 PM

The notion that the Lord of the Rings is the One Ring is inherently flawed for one reason.

The ring and Sauron are parts of each other. Sauron could not control the other rings with out the One Ring and the One Ring could not control the other rings with out Sauron. Since the 3 rings of the Elves were being used even while the One Ring still existed apart from Sauron. Galadriel had Nenya on with the One Ring a person away and she still resisted.

So the title I believe refers to Sauron with his Ring is the Lord of the Rings.

[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: GreyIstar ]

12-11-2002, 03:29 PM	#21
GreyIstar Wight Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Dallas Posts: 116	The notion that the Lord of the Rings is the One Ring is inherently flawed for one reason. The ring and Sauron are parts of each other. Sauron could not control the other rings with out the One Ring and the One Ring could not control the other rings with out Sauron. Since the 3 rings of the Elves were being used even while the One Ring still existed apart from Sauron. Galadriel had Nenya on with the One Ring a person away and she still resisted. So the title I believe refers to Sauron with his Ring is the Lord of the Rings. [ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: GreyIstar ] __________________ Keeper of the site Ring Lord. "Dangerous!" cried Gandalf. "And so am I, very dangerous: more dangerous than anything you will ever meet, unless you are brought alive before the seat of the Dark Lord."