As has been stated by davem, Tolkien seemed slightly Elvish in that he believed that things were good once and he preferred to look back upon what
once was . Perhaps thats why he wanted so desperately to write a history book.
But, true, Tolkien did show the alternate method of Man's progress forward. Does this mean that we might have found a somewhat objective author? Heaven forbid! And he died before I could meet him.
And, if Heaven and Hell are both depicted and are both capable of destruction, is the conclusion that we can't be inbetween? And that they are destructible?
b_b