Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Saucepan Man
Although I believe that book-based adaptations are excluded from the category of best original script ...
|
Though Walsh and Boyens still wouldn't have won; not unless Hollywood politics is even worse than I imagined!!
I, in no way, want to sound sexist or chauvinist (honestly) but...
1. I felt that having 2 women predominantly write the script was detriment to the whole Trilogy. I mean (and some have already mentioned these in this thread), there were a lot of (IMO, too many) cheesy lines that had too much femininity about them.
2. Characterisations such as Legolas had a (too) obvious fangirl (no disrespect to fangirls out there
) element to it. I can see that for commercial success you need to have some "glamour" but to that kind of extent?
3. I know that both writers were very inexperienced. Should they have taken such lead roles in creating a decent script for such an important movie? Certainly, some of their "naivity" came out on numerous occasions.
PS
Please don't lambast me for asking these questions. I only want to know if others share similar sentiments.