Thread: Which is worse?
View Single Post
Old 08-07-2004, 08:46 AM   #7
Boromir88
Laconic Loreman
 
Boromir88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 7,519
Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.Boromir88 is wading through the Dead Marshes.
Send a message via AIM to Boromir88 Send a message via MSN to Boromir88
1420! Replies

The fact that Arwen's fate was "tied" to the ring, is a sickly thought. It is true however, that everyone's fate is tied to the ring, but you don't have people falling deadly sick because of it. Now, you have Arwen who's "immortality" is beginning to fade but Elrond riding to Dunharrow made it seem like a "race against time" sort of thing. Like, ahhh if the Ring isn't destroyed soon Arwen will DIE!!! I mean everyone will die, eventually, if Sauron gets the ring but you don't got people falling sick because it wasn't destroyed.

I do have to agree, seeing Arwen at Helm's deep would have been a disaster, I might actually make her rescue of Frodo in FOTR, and make that above the "tied to the ring" because that again is extremely out of character. Jeez can't PJ get some love for GLORFINDEL!
Boromir88 is offline   Reply With Quote