There is almost a subversive morality in LOTR. The reader isn't beaten over the head with it, but Prof. Tolkien very intentionally wove a decidedly theistic ethic into the tapestry of his sub-creation.
I do agree with the view that JRR left it implicit for the reader to discover. That's why I think of it as being subversive. The story is wholly understandable and enjoyable without it, but the experience is richer and fuller if you can pick up these elements.
Sorry, ramblings from a sleep-deprived, overwhelmed wanderer in search of affordable, yet beautiful engagement rings. If Greyhame survives this test, he will be the true Lord of the Rings (except good). [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img]
__________________
Poo-tee-weet?
|