I would only say that I am aware that my last post was 'book heavy'. However since many of the arguments in this thread are taking the form of "any change from the book is bad because the book is flawless" I do think that combating the idea that the book is flawless is necessary to illustrate that some changes were required.<P>However maybe my last post was a bit too 'involved'.
__________________
"This is the most blatant case of false advertising since my suit against the movie The Neverending Story!"
Lionel Hutz
|