On one hand, you could say that Peter Jackson could have done a better job. He could have stayed closer to the plot, characterised some people better, taken out some annoying/un-funny/boring parts.<BR>But then, you think of how much worse it could have been *coughanimatedversioncough*. He certainly didn't go into the project half heartedly, he tried pretty darn hard and if you think about it the whole thing isn't all that bad. Of couse, it could be improved but no movie that I've seen is perfect. And I know that it's fun to make fun of the films, (heck, I know I do). And although he did make some errors (in some peoples opinions; many, while others love every single second) I think we should give him credit for trying and, on the whole, doing a pretty fair job. <BR>And, in answer to the original question, it's certainly not fair or right to ban him from making movies (as well as it not being overly possible). At the end of the day, it's all opinion.
__________________
'What news from the South, O sighing wind, do you bring to me at eve?
Where now is Boromir the Fair? He tarries and I grieve.'
|