I'm stil really upset about some changes they made but my overall impression is that it's worse than FOTR. In FOTR they have "allowed" the caracters to be just as they are described in the book (one could proably say they've changed Arwen but then again we don't know much about her since she's not all that important in the books), this gives FOTR a few more "types" of personalities. In TTT they have only have two "types" of people those who have a strong will and are ready to fight for the freedom of ME and those who cannot resist the power of the One Ring, and then to make it even MORE exciting they've changed a few things like banning Eomer and changing Faramir completely (I sure can't remember him being that arrogant, in TTT he's just simply portraied as a scum). <BR>The Lord of the rings is a beautiful story, it is written in such a beautiful way and you get the feeling that everything they do is just a small part of a much longer history (the one about ME) simply because they keep seing (ruins etc) or refering to things that has happened. This feeling is somewhat preserved in FOTR but it's completly lost in TTT. <BR>My favorite character in TTT is defenitly Gollum, he's so well done, I was amazed. I thought he looked computeranimated in FOTR and to be honest I was a bit worried, but I loved him in TTT. He alone makes the film worth seeing (or atleast bits and peices of it)<BR>However no matter how negative and disapointed I may sound, I still would like to see the film once again (after rereading the books) before I'm able to say that it's worthlessm but I do recon they've changed bits that didn't need to be changed. Ok I'm gonna stop now before you all start to hate me.
|