<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR> Addressing the thread and not the topic of the thread: this is a literary website, that is, one based on the books of Tolkien, and as such, any discussion of the films must of necessity refer back to the source material.<BR>Indeed, even were this not a book-based site, I would argue valid criticism of the film must involve a comparison with the text. I am not wide of the mark when I state my view that most viewers will see and understand the film as a translation of the earlier work.<P>Therefore all comparitive criticism is relevant here. To people who would say, "Don't bash the film, it is a stand-alone work," I would riposte thus: "There are purely movie oriented sites out there."<P>Then again, I may just be grouchy after that tepid and rather wasted three hours of an especially busy week.<P><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>This is a movie section though. There is a books section.<P>Maybe I'm gifted but I don't let the book ruin my enjoyment of the movie nor the movie ruin my enjoyment of the Book. I will always say the book is better than the movie but does that make my watching the movie a waste of 6 hours?? I think not.
__________________
Keeper of the site Ring Lord.
"Dangerous!" cried Gandalf. "And so am I, very dangerous: more dangerous than anything you will ever meet, unless you are brought alive before the seat of the Dark Lord."
|