![]() |
Ralph Bakshi's the Lord of the Rings
is it only me
that finds that the 1978 film has a charm which is more connected with the actual books? :smokin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDmEx...dTQDNw&index=1 |
The camera work has a certain charm to it, as do some of the actual characters and dialects. But the music isn't as good nor is Gollum lol, *** is gollum doing, "give it to smeagol" and then that camera angle lmao... :D The phasing is also off.
|
Quote:
these films have a soul they are made so you should sit in the dark a freezing cold december winter in a small room with a friend smoke pot and watch it on an old 20 inch tv such experiences are not delivered with flawless high definition multi-billion dollar films which you rent on a dvd and watch on your widescreen tv no the crappiness is a part of the charm |
Not just me. I started off like some in dropping the book after the first chapter. After seeing this film when like 12 or 13 I read the book fully, feeling much better.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
It has a special place in my heart because I saw it at age three, making it my real introduction to Tolkien (or Tolkien-related stuff, anyway). All the same, I thought it was embarrassingly corny even then. Yes, really.
Not to say that PJ's version manages to avoid corniness. EDIT: Maybe it's just that I wasn't allowed to smoke pot when I was three. |
Certainly I thought Bakshi's Ringwraiths were far more chilling than PJ's shrieking Sith Lords.
|
Quote:
*blinks absently* Ummmm...what were we talking about again? Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.