The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum - The two UT's?!? What is the book that I have then?

The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/index.php)

- Novices and Newcomers (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)

- - The two UT's?!? What is the book that I have then? (http://forum.barrowdowns.com/showthread.php?t=11825)

The two UT's?!? What is the book that I have then?

I'm probably going to buy the HoMe series. I have already a book in Finnish, which is called Keskeneräisten tarujen kirja and it's original/english name is Unfinished tales of Númenor and Middle-Earth. So I was very confused as I found out that there are actually two UT's.
I don't want to pay for a book that I already have, since I don't have much money, so could someone help me to identify my book: is it completely different than this two UT's? Or is it only the first part? Or does it include both? This book is first published in 1980 by George Allen & Unwin Ltd. It contains following chapters (I've translated the names bay myself so they aren't maybe correct):
- First Part: First Age
I Of Tuor and his coming to Gondolin
II Narn i Hîn Húrin
- Second Part: Second Age
I The Island of Númenor
II Aldarion and Erendis
III The Heirs of Elros
IV The Story of Galadriel and Celeborn
- Third Part: Third Age
I The Tragedy of the Gladden Fields
II Cirion and Eorl
III The Journey to Erebor
IV The Search for The Ring
V The Battles in the Fords of Isen
- Fourth Part
I Drúedain
II Istari
III Palantíri
I'm very grateful, if someone helps me...

I've not heard of there being two UTs, but the title Unfinished tales of Númenor and Middle-Earth is sometimes interchanged with the shorter title Unfinished Tales. They are the same book, you'll be glad to know :) .

However, if you are buying HoME, the first two books of the series are entitled The Book of Lost Tales Volume 1 and The Book of Lost Tales Volume 2, so when it comes to Lost Tales, there are indeed two different books.

If you're short of cash, why not start collecting the books in the series with those that most spark your interest? There's no reason why you have to read them in order. Look here for more info on each of the books and decide what you most want to read about!

Quote:

There's no reason why you have to read them in order.

It's not necessary to read them in order, certainly, but the sequential approach does have its virtues. References to material from earlier volumes abound and will go over the head of one who hasn't read them. Overall, I think that reading them in order provides the most coherent, intelligible experience.

That may be true but I bought the first four as they emerged and found them very hard work and that combined with financial and other pressures at the time ( I had started University) more or less put the kybosh on Tolkien for me for a decade or so. When they reprinted them, I had got back into Tolkien and decided I wanted to complete my set regardless (for similar reasons I bought "The Road goes ever on" despite my piano playing not being up to snuff ..) and the "History of the Lord of the Rings" volumes are so much more readable.

I do resolve to read the 12 systematically rather than "dipping" but I still think it is perfectly acceptable to head for what interests you - and it is better to read some out of synch than be put off the whole. We all have our thresh-holds of interest and the early volumes of HoME were possibly mine. We will see when I attempt them again. But I would have been sorry to miss out on some of the gems in the later volumes because of that...

Also, these are not the kind of books that are discounted at the supermarket and I had to order mine unseen ( they are rarely "on the shelf" - even good bookshops may have half a dozen editions of the Rings but have nothing more obscure than UT). It can be a lot of money to spend on a book that doesn't interest you.

From David Bratman's essay 'The Literary Value of The History of Middle-earth' in the collection 'Tolkien's Legendarium:

Quote:

The History of Middle-earth was not designed by its editor for casual reading, and only scattered parts of it have the potential for the kind of widesp-ead popularity that came to The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. But ths much of it that can be read as straightforward narrative, ignor the textual notes, by a reader with a sympathetic attitude towards uthor's and editor's intent. And of course it is a tremendously rich source for scholarly study.
ow then should one read The History of Middle-earth? Twelve large, solid, nearly identical-looking volumes can be a daunting prospect. The bvious answer, to begin at the beginning and go on until one has reached end and then stop, does not necessarily apply. Such a reading would give the reader a nearly full picture of Tolkien's creative imagination as applied in his Jegendarium, from the first stirrings of the 1910S to the final] notes of the 197os. But not every reader will want or need such an approach, especially because of the tremendous amount of duplication in differen t versions of the same stories. The volumes are made to be dipped into and consulted, especially by readers already familiar with The Lord of the Rings md The Silmarillion. Which books readers should choose to read for pleasure depend on their individual tastes and interests.
Some Tolkien readers will not get much out of The History of Middleearth. Those who consider the post - Tolkien epic fantasies of Robert Jordan, Terry Brooks, Dennis McKiernan, and David Eddings to be equal in appeal to The Lord of the Rings will probably not enjoy Tolkien's posthumous works. But those who find something special in Tolkien's writing above that of other fantasists can choose from of a variety of material, catering to a variety of tastes:

. Readers who, like Sam Gamgee, want to hear more about Elves, or who are :aptivated by the tales in Aragorn's lay of Beren and Llithien and in Bilbo's poem of Earendil, should read The Silmarillion, which functions as ;reader's edition" of "The Silmarillion," and follow it with The Boof Lost Tales, then with the other History of Middle-earth books, in partular The Shaping of Middle-earth and The Lost Road.
. Readers who most enjoy The Hobbit might also enjoy The Book of Lost Tales, though among Tolkien's posthumous works they should first turn to his children's stories: The Father Christmas Letters, Mr. Bliss, and Roverandom.
. Readers who like Tolkien's poetry for its own sake should definitely read The Lays ofBeleriand.
. Readers who most enjoy the appendices to The Lord of the Rings with their details of kings and genealogies should read Unfinished Tales and The Peoples of Middle-earth.
. Readers who most enjoy Tolkien's storytelling abilities should also read Unfinished Tales, followed by The Peoples of Middle-earth, Morgoth's Ring. and The War of the Jewels, in that order.
. Readers curious about the "making" of The Lord of the Rings, as one might watch a documentary on the making of a favorite movie, should read The Return of the Shadow and its successors in the subseries.
. Readers who come to Tolkicn from his fcllow Inklings, C. S. Lewis and Charles Williams, should read Sauron Defeated for The Notion Club Papers and The Lost Road for the title story.
Readers interested in Tolkienian linguistics will find the glossaries, etymologies, and linguistic essays in The Book of Lost Tales, The Lost Road, The War of the Jewels, a"\d The Peoples of Middle-earth of particular interest.
There is, then, much in The History of Middle-earth to reward the sympathetic eyes of those who care to look. In a famous essay. Tolkien complained that "Beowulf has been used as a quarry of fact and fancy far more assiduously than it has been studied as a work of art" (MC, 5). He did not mean that scholarly quarrying was necessarily a misuse of Beowulf, and still less is it a misuse of The History of Middle-earth, which requires its editor's elucidation merely to be generally comprehensible. But I hope to have shown, as Tolkien did for Beowulf, that there is art in this unique and valuable series of books, and that readers will find their way to it.

(copied with a pen scanner, so please forgive any mistakes in transcription)

I'm not saying that it's morally reprehensible to read HoMe out of order. I'm sure there are many people who don't have sufficient interest for that, and would find it excruciatingly boring.

I'm simply recommending reading them in sequence, based on the immensely pleasurable experience I enjoyed in doing so.

I agree partly with Aiwendil and partly with Mith. If you're going to read the first few, I-V, I suppose, then I recommend reading them in order. I read Lays of Beleriand first just so I could get straight to the pretty poetry, and didn't completely understand everything. There were some unfamiliar references that were confusing -- mostly the references to Gnomes confused me until someone very nicely answered my question here as to who they were. BoLT I and II proved exhausting and so I'm taking a short break from HoME for a bit...

I started reading the Return of the Shadow (VI) a while ago, though, and it seemed to me that it can stand alone. The rest which cover the Lord of the Rings (the Treason of Isengard, the War of the Ring) can probably be read without having read the previous ones, too.

You can get the history of LOTR volumes as a cased set (with the bit that overspills in a slim volume) so there is clearly a market for those volumes separate from the hard core full set.

I guess I am a little sensitive because I was taught that it was a character weakness not to finish a book and still feel a little guilty if I don't (unless the book is utter tripe) but while reading all sequentially may well be ideal if you are up to the task, I just wanted to emphasize that it is worth looking at the later volumes even if you are daunted by the early ones.

Sorry for the stopit question, but: how many books are there? :eek:
I only have the Sil, is there a list of all the books?

The books set in Middle Earth that were published in Tolkien's life time are:

The Hobbit
The Lord of The Rings
The Adventures of Tom Bombadil (Poetry)
The Road Goes Ever On (Poetry set to music with an analysis of the Elvish poems "A Elbereth Gilthoniel" and NAmarie

However after he died, Tolkien's son Christopher edited and published the rest of his father's writing on Middle Earth.

The Silmarillion alone is presented as a "finished" work
In Unfinished Tales described above, his role as editor is much more explicit and there are many notes ans some alternative versions. Nevertheless it is quite readable, and parts may interest people who don't like the Sil.

The History of Middle Earth is a 12 volume + index collection of early drafts and working notes. Each volume has it's own title and the volumes that contain the drafts of the Lord of the Rings are known as "THe History of the Lord of the rings"

Hope that helps

Here is the complete booklist from the Barrow-Downs main site page.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mithalwen

I guess I am a little sensitive because I was taught that it was a character weakness not to finish a book and still feel a little guilty if I don't (unless the book is utter tripe) but while reading all sequentially may well be ideal if you are up to the task, I just wanted to emphasize that it is worth looking at the later volumes even if you are daunted by the early ones.

I've now got a notion to sit and read all the volumes in order, although I must have already done this to some extent with the early volumes many years ago as I used to religiously visit the Tolkien shelf in the local library and snap up anything I hadn't seen before. I'd like to see if it gave me the sense of a 'story' of the creation of Tolkien's life work.

But I still say that if reading all the volumes is daunting - and it may well be so for anyone quite new to Tolkien - then it is well worth beginning in the middle with those relating to LotR. And some of the volumes do include 'stand-alone' pieces, such as The New Shadow, set in the fourth age.

Now, while I was never taught it was a weakness not to finish a book, I do feel guilty if I don't at least give a book a chance. Even if I only read a random chapter I would call that giving it a chance. ;) If the rest of the book is not useful, interesting or entertaining then I'm afraid I move on, as there are far too many books waiting to be read. I also have a nasty habit of skim-reading factual books, looking for the parts I need to read, a habit picked up from work. :( Maybe one of the reasons I like Tolkien so much is that skim-reading is out of the question; it's all too easy to miss something.

Wow, a lot of books.
Thanks a lot Mithalwen and Estelyn, for that information.
I'm reading the Sil right now and I hope I'll get my hand son the unfinished tales soon. :)

Ah but Lal ....I was also taught that "only a woman of ill-repute would read a novel before lunch" (that one didn't register though .... :D) and "a lounge is something they have in Hotels, darling" ... (which did and causes frequent verbal contortions)... :o

But certainly, despite my struggles with the early volumes, I found that the LOTR HoME volumes a relatively strightforward read.

I skim factual books if I need something specific.....but it took me many years to trust my judgement and accept that if a book hadn't engaged me (and I do give them a fair shot) and have very wide tastes) then I didn't have to waste my life finishing them.