Well, it could have been worse. She could have killed the seer.
|
But really, for god's sake... there were several people who were very happy to keep voting for you! :(
|
Quote:
I really shouldn't. It's probably a good thing you can't see me right now. :D hS |
Holy Moly 2 of these pages are in the last 15 minutes oh sticks...
At least sally didn't claim to be the Ranger... :rolleyes:
Are people who are insisting on her revealing the Hunt doing so because they are afraid she is hunting one of them? Quote:
Ok, caught up to GT. Welcome, newcomers! |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
My goal was to dissuade people from voting for her, which it did. The fact that I got night killed made her look less wolfish to me. However, the fact that Huey voted for her toDay opens up a whole new discussion. After all, getting the "evil QT vote" for the second day in a row was about the safest position Brinn could be in. |
Quote:
hS |
Members of the QT
Just updating a list here as well. I'll try to update this daily form now on as the Thread seems to grow pretty fast. :)
Galadriel55 – Andróg, the Cobbler (voted into QT on Day1) Rikae – Haldir, formerly healthy person (infected by the shady Infectors on Night2) Huinesoron – Hareth, an Infector (voted into QT on Day2) Kitanna – Huor, the Ranger (infected in the woods by the Infectors on Night3) Sally – Túrin, the Hunter (voted into QT on Day3) Macalaure – Grithnir, healthy person (dragged into the QT by the Hunter on Day3) On another issue. The first tie-breaker on Day4 will be Sally. If Sally is not involved in a tie, then it will be hS whose vote decides. In a case where neither is part of a tie, it is G55 who calls it. If everyone votes a different person (omly other option if I counted it correctly in haste), then it is the latest incomer aka. next Night's victim whose vote counts. This really is a special Village... |
Quote:
See what I mean about low stakes / high level psychology? How do you know what level of bluff this is happening at? And who is being bluffed more: the GT or the future QT? |
Skimmed the thread. I see I greatly overestimated the amount of conspiracy, or even thought, that you baddies put into the QT vote. :p
We're a majority of innocents in here at this point, and as long as we can remotely get our act together, we're in charge of the vote. I am very sure that Boro is the seer. He has dreamt of Lommy and Brinn and found them innocent. I'm not sure who the third person is, but that person is innocent as well. |
Quote:
Sorry, my cobbler friend, you're outnumbered now and logical discussions can resume. Obviously "Huey voted for Brinn" isn't a complete case against her, but it does justify a close look through her posting history which (finally!) I can talk openly about. |
Quote:
(I have never said this.) hS |
Quote:
|
When I went to analyze Boro I saw several things that looked excessively weird, but after a while the lights went on. I had to re-write everything and hint at him that I figured it out while keeping him in that semi-suspicious range that usually keeps people safe-ish from kills and lynches. I hope I didn't hint to obviously. I can post the details later.
We have all night after all.... :rolleyes: |
I do have to say, Sally: If you had been more straightforward about your pick, then:
A) People's reactions to it would have been more telling. B) I could have summarized my thoughts with a noose around my neck. If I turn out innocent, as I did, that might've been helpful for the village the next Day. :( |
I am rather annoyed no one noticed my hunter hints.
|
Quote:
I've spent the past Night and Day wondering if reappearing and claiming when the wagon on me got going would have helped. Thanks to this lynch, at least I can be comfortable I was going down anyway. :) hS |
Quote:
|
On why I thought Boro was the seer.
The way he stays uninvolved but is able to go at great lengths about his thoughts when poked over it. He's not just goofing around having fun, he's just playing his cards really close to his chest. His case against Lhuna - he didn't analyze anyone closely like that, so why her? Well, his analysis firmly rests on the assumption of Lommy's innocence. If he knew Lommy was innocent, it would make sense to suspect someone who makes a case against her that he doesn't like. Quote:
Quote:
He's also very panicky about a bandwaggon against him after Sally's reveal. Borowolf does not lose his cool that quickly, but Boroseer might. It's not airtight, so feel free to make fun of it. :p I think he dreamt of Lommy during Night1 or Night2 and Brinn during Night3. I don't have any idea who the third is. I wonder whether it might have been Rikae during Night2. |
I agree, Mac, that Brinn comment is especially odd.
|
Oh, but you haven't spotted the best bit. :smokin:
|
Do share then. ;)
|
Quote:
Or, as people on the thread keep reminding each other, I don't know anything. So, I see something you don't see! I am just really happy you picked up on those bits and not the others. |
Quote:
|
So we're voting Boro toMorrow, is that what I'm hearing? Sounds good to me!
hS |
Kitanna? Sally? I'd love to hear from you! :)
We're 4 against 2 with the tie-breaker on our side, 5 against 2 once we get to vote again. So we're looking pretty good in here, unless we don't work together or have no-votes. |
Did anyone else get a temporary blackout a short while ago? :confused:
Quote:
|
Speaking of swing and a miss....
Sorry, I had entered a brief but intense period of mourning. The people who were helping me paint my house thought someone had actually died.
I'm so forking angry. I finally decided, at literally the last minute, to be end the question of Mac and Huey once and for all. Sadly, I was on the losing side. So sorry, Mac. Not bolded because I'm on mobile and the site is being wonky. |
Quote:
Quote:
Our DL is in about two hours, yes/no? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Legate was such a curious cookie. They should fry him, perhaps. :p |
Quote:
*daydream: "No, I am the Innocent Child / Seer! Leave me for the wolves to kill!"* Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We can discuss now, but it could be wasted if the person we're analyzing gets night killed, so I'm going to wait for them. We should probably not engage with G55 either. She doesn't know anything & is going to do whatever she can to provoke (if anyone wants to analyze Hui/their interactions, though, have at it - I'm going to be sifting through the living thread). |
Quote:
We also need to look at the under-the-radar types. There's been too much noisy debate about a handful of people and it's giving me a creepy feeling. |
Quote:
I have been kind to you. But speaking of provoking, here is a thought-provoking question I did not get a chance to throw out on the GT. So while we chat the Night boredom away, here goes. If The Phantom was playing, he would surely have figured out a way to exploit the Innocent Child role. Probably by making them reveal early. Why? I don't know, I'm not TP, but he always has a reason. It does give the village a known innocent at the cost of losing their dear Lalaith in the Night, but it may be very useful in untangling some of the knots that were tied on D2 and D3. |
Quote:
|
Hush now, child. The other desserts are talking. ;)
|
Quote:
I'm not a schemer, and look where that got me. ... wait... that's not quite how that quote goes. :rolleyes: Anyway. A known innocent is a game-changer in the late game and roadkill in the early game. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.