Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Now this is more like it.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So I feel like I've said quite a lot. If you mean I've not contributed to the discussion of what we think the wolves will do, what the NW specifically will do, and what the rules for the Medium are (not to mention what a future game might look like), you're right, I haven't - because I don't think those are useful for finding wolves. As I recall, the Day One Game Mechanics Discussion last time was started by the Cobbler. Checking before posting, I see Pitch has quoted me but not said anything about it... o.O And has flagged Lottie's 'keep the NW alive' concept, which raised pretty much the same eyebrow for me. hS |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Reading back over a few posts in more detail, I flagged this not-exchange: Quote:
Quote:
...or I might be paranoid. :) It would be a bit bold (sorry) for Day One wolves, wouldn't it? hS |
Okay, all we need is a fourth one and I think we have the entire pack. :smokin:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't think the NW would try to get themselves lynched in the first Day or two because they do still count as a wolf in numbers and getting lynched too early is risky. However, I would expect that if the wolves bus one of their packmates that it would be the NW.
Keep in mind that the wolves may plan ahead all they want, but depending on how each Day plays out, those plans may fall by the wayside and shift completely as the game progresses. While we do want the NW dead because a wolf is a wolf, in an ideal world, the NW would be the last wolf that we lynch. But I have no idea how we would actually plan for that except for sheer luck. I have no reservations to lynch a potential NW, but I would attempt to focus on suspicious folk who are less likely to be the NW at least early in the game - a potential under the radar wolf, for instance. Unfortunately, those are the wolves that are harder to spot. |
Quote:
Quote:
Would it be amiss to ask what "bold moves" could constitute, in general terms? I feel like it's a term that's used a fair bit, so I'd like to know what people mean by it. hS |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
hS |
Well, I'm finally here! First off, a disclaimer: the deadline is 1am our time, I'm back to work full time and sadly my job isn't one where you can play ww, so I'll be around a lot less than last game. Maybe it's not an entirely bad thing... :D
~*~ Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
When I first saw the thread I was like "yikes, three pages", but there was surprisingly little to go on. Come on guys, why haven't you solved Day1 while I was away? :p |
Quote:
|
Looks like a lot of debate on whether or not we should lynch the NW or not. ?? I mean, sure, would be nice to leave the NW for last so their ability doesn't come into play. But I agree with Pitch and Nilp, since there's no way of identifying the NW before they're killed this is pretty much theoretical.
Huin is definitely a man on a mission (I love Rikae's choice of words!). So far I disagree with Kath and think this probing and poking makes him lean more innocent than not - last game, when he was a wolf, he felt more cautious somehow and less eager to poke at people for reactions. On the other hand, his theory of how Lottie and Kath are plotting to get him killed made me raise an eyebrow - though last time I suspected someone for being paranoid it was four innocent people in a row :rolleyes: Not sure about Kath herself though - I'm not convinced she's plotting with Lottie, but her argument against Huin was odd. Quote:
Lommy makes a point about Nilp's "I'm a nasty carnivore" -comment looking like a double bluff, and I do know what she means - this could be a Nilpwolf using his own tropes and mannerisms as a cover and exaggerating a bit, trusting his reputation for being chaotic and suicidal on D1 to give him a pass. Or could be innocent Nilp excited to be back. I'm flip-flopping myself into a corner here :rolleyes: |
Quote:
That said, I agree that Kath's description of your behaviour wasn't really accurate, as you did give your opinions on the people you pushed. What I don't agree with is you implying Lottie in the (nonexistent) plot. [Note to posterity: soft wolf-on-wolf between Kath and Hui + attempt to drag Lottie into it which fizzled out subsequently?] |
I would laugh if Kath and Hui were co-wolves again, but I think they both have a bit different vibe from the last game (Kath is more straightforward/carefree, Hui less cautious/diplomatic) which makes me feel better about both of them.
|
Quote:
Lottie's helpful explanation of what 'bold' means is why I'm not still worried about that; it shows she wasn't saying what I thought she was. I'm figuring Kath was reading Lottie the way she intended, so there's not really a 'plot' any more, just an isolated suspicion. Make sense? hS |
I meant just to check whether my gut feeling - that hS feels a bit over-eager to sound like one who has only the best of the village in mind - had actually any basis in the posting. And well, the number of these quotes kind of got a little out of hand, but I think they do confirm the feeling.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It does raise my eyebrows a little. So if I'd have to vote right now, I'd consider voting for hS. I do hope we get something better than that though to base our votes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Because I like lists
Seems like their usual innocent self - Rikae, Greenie, Nogrod
Seems unlike recent evil self - Hui, Kath Vague good feeling - Blind Guardian, Lottie Under my radar so far - Legate, Mac, Pitch, Brinn Did they say anything?? - Shasta, Sally Made me raise an eyebrow - Nilp, Form Also I caught myself thinking "Inziladun is really flying under my radar in this game, I don't remember a single post he made" and then I realised maybe because he's not playing... :eek::D:rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
4AM in Southeast bloody Asia
The voting as of the moment:
(Time reckoned from the start of the DAY, known innocents underlined, known baddies emphasised, person/s in the lead in bold.) +0609: Nilp – Nilp (Nilp – 1) ----------NOTHING FOLLOWS---------- And there's two hours before the deadline, if I can do time zones. I mean, this is a swell result for me, really. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
TBF, Hui does tend to overdo the 'responsible innocent' routine even when he is one, so I wouldn't hold that alone against him. Another thing. It strikes me that suspecting Nilp for double-bluffing is terribly easy (because he totally would), as is defending him because 'he'd do that no matter what he is' (because he totally would). Also any vote for him on the grounds that he wants to be lynched is so easy it's not even funny, so if anybody would actually go there... I was going to say it would be another point against them, but it would be so blatantly no-trail that it would actually not be no-trail at all, if you get what I'm saying. |
Okay. I'll try to go through the Day again. It's pretty bad if we have just, basically three names (?), circulating around in some vague manner only two hours before the DL. It's a fair chance none of them is a wolf and the lycanthropes lean back on their armchairs taking one more sip of wine just being pleased.
Some fresh openings would do good at this point. EDIT: X'd with Pitch |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Not the Rona. Just a terrible headache. I'm here but not thinking clearly, and to make things clear on my intentions.... ++No vote, or whatever Don't feel comfy with my thoughts right now and don't want to make any mistakes. Some sustenance and then back to bed for me! X'd since Lommy |
Quote:
|
Did Nogrod say "fresh openings"?
Ok Shasta said it first but what about "Pitchwife is the cobbler"?
I mean that's the only way I'm reading this nonsense that started sounding like valid concern over people jumping on the easy target and then spiraled into wilfully giving people headache: Quote:
edit: xed with S&S |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.