![]() |
Quote:
Danceless and dishless, but never more dull, - silver spoons, given to Lobelia S.B. Weapon fell in the hands of a crone, - umbrella, given to Adelard Took Neither of Lorien, nor Dimrill Dale, - mirror (but not Of Galadriel or -mere), given to Angelica Baggins In Mundburg or Imladris would be at home, - could be the bookcase, given to Hugo Bracegirdle; both those places are noted as stores of knowledge Something to carry, to store, or to hold, - ???? A sword of speech, a well of words. - pen and inkwell, given to Milo Burrows The ???? ought to be the wastepaper basket for Dora Baggins. It would fit "basket", but the specific type doesn't quite line up. The other option would be the One Ring, which was given to Frodo with an attached note (well, letter), and is at various times carried, stored, and held. hS |
That is correct, and perfectly explained! I was thiking the more general "basket" for the ???. I could not think of any basket references elsewhere in the text to use as the clue, hence more of a general description - can you think of any?
Now back over to Hui! |
Quote:
I'll try and put something together; not sure what just yet, but I'll try! hS |
Okay, here we go:
Red for fire, burning fierce From forge to raging final cost. Black for kinship's oath renewed, A crown unsought 'neath shadow lost. Silver shining for the gold That lingers when all hope is gone. Thrice we chose - but at the last What choice shared we, all three, ere dawn? hS |
Red for fire, burning fierce
From forge to raging final cost. These sound like Feanor. |
Quote:
hS |
Red, black and silver...
|
The gold one initially reminded me of Aragorn - all that is gold does not glitter - and thus potentially Men of Dunharrow fulfilling their oath before the dawn from the Orodruin cloud, but can't really fit that to the rest of the lines.
Kinship's oath renewed sounds like Fingolfin's assurances that he will follow his elder brother, and his unexpected and unsought title of High King (but beneath shadow lost? No idea). |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
hS |
If red is Feanor, black is Fingolfin and gold is Finarfin, then who are the 'three'? It could be three of them, but you said Feanor isn't one of the three. Hm, maybe their children...but that doesn't work either, because while Feanor and Finarfin have a surviving child, Fingolfin does not...
Unless it's that choice, but if it were that choice, there should be five, not three...Or, it could be three, because three were in the last set, and each set chose once, making in three sets with three choices... |
Quote:
hS |
Red for fire, burning fierce
From forge to raging final cost. Well, if these lines don't mean either Feanor or Maedhros, then what could they mean...? Orodruin, perhaps...? |
Quote:
hS |
What else could it mean then? Some other meaning in another language?
|
Oh, wait, something is nagging at my brain...
And I think I know what it is, thanks to your explanation of 'silver for gold' line to mean 'silver for Finarfin', and there is only one silver in Finarfin's life, his spouse. Feanor's spouse happened to have red hair, and Fingolfin's had black hair, presumably. But then, what was the choice? I know that all three chose to stay in Aman. Would that be the 'choice' you are talking about? |
Quote:
Over to you! hS *Technically Nerdanel has brown hair - I think according to the Shibboleth - but I take that to be a reddish-brown or russet. |
I like that riddle. And now here is the one of my own
The sorrow of the Elves is they live beyond their time Until the world forgets them, save in tales and rhyme The sorrow of the Elves is that all they love must die Time withers all about them, yet the Elves it passes by The sorrow of the Elves made them seek another place And I alone remain, on these shores, I am the last of my lost race Now I, alone, remain to mourn and count the cost Of wars fought and lives lost The sorrow now is mine, and it cannot heal, For how long will the pain remain real And how long must I bear the stamp of sorrow’s seal? |
I keep coming back to this in the hopes of finding an answer that's not the obvious, but...
... is it just Maglor? hS |
Quote:
Yes. |
Quote:
I'll see what I can come up with; hmm, actually I have an idea, just need to see if it works. :) hS |
And so the trend of editing song lyrics to make Tolkien riddles continues.
|
Okay, the one I wanted to do doesn't work, but I came up with this instead:
A sister to a brother A husband to a wife A daughter to a father A brother to a sister A mother to a son A husband to the first A chain of six who never met, But who died first? No Hobbits are involved in the answer, so don't say I never do anything nice for you. :D hS |
Hm.
I do have a plausible guess, but the last line invalidates it... Unless... *looks at the riddle more closely* Why does this remind me of well... *squints* If the last question is literal, then I'll go with Mandos' interpretation, and say that Finwe died first. :D But Finwe didn't die first, did he? Miriel did. ;) |
Quote:
(I believe Finwe was the first slain in Aman; Miriel just died.) hS |
Then I don't know what to do with the riddle. If the wife in the second line is the same as the sister in the first, I might, but otherwise, no. The clues are too vague and can refer to anyone who died, ever, and there are a lot of those. I can even say that Eilinel died first, and be correct, given the vagueness...
|
Quote:
The word "chain" is doing more than you give it credit for. hS |
So, a few disconnected thoughts, to maybe help the collective effort.
We have 6 iterations of "a [kinsman] to a [kinsman, mostly]". Then there is "a chain of 6 who never met" - begging the connection that it just links all the above statements together, as opposed to a whole separate chain of 6. The difficulty? "The husband to the first" I initially took to mean "the first line/sister/answer" - but that implies a meeting between two answers, it is very hard to be a husband without ever meeting your wife, long-distance relationships aren't popularized in Middle-earth. So perhaps "first" does not, after all, refer to the first line, but to an actual First of some sort. So what do all the relationship statements have in common? As the only concrete clue we have is the question in the end, my inclination is that they are somehow related to deaths - perhaps actuall killing, or prophecies, or even curses. Actual killings - I have trouble coming up with that many examples of kinslaying in first degree relatives, so probably not. But it does generally put me in mind of the Hurin family and the Gondolin fiasco as potential rich sources for answers. Another instance that comes to mind is Finrod's "I must be free to fulfil my vow" as potentially one of the brother/sister pairs. Were there any good Numenorian child/parent examples? I feel like there ought to be. |
Or maybe the six of them were literally chained with a chain. Except no women were ever chained. Unless you mean a metaphorical chain...like Miriel being chained by Pharazon, or Eowyn being chained by expectations...
|
Or maybe it is Hurin's family. After all, Turin and Nienor were both brother and sister and husband and wife. And if this is the case, well, I am the one who died first. :cool:
|
Quote:
'tis neither Gondolin nor the House of Hurin. hS |
Quote:
Because it specifically says 'the chain of six that never met'. Unless the six are linked by a common bond/chain...but with that, I keep thinking Turin is that chain... |
As a different take, I decided to draw this out as a family tree, taking the first member of each line to be the same as the second of the preceding line. We get a pair of male/female siblings marrying a pair of male/female cousins - a closed chain, if you will. Now, do I really have to go perusing through the genealogies to find this pattern?
Hmmm... Hurin/Huor and Rian/Morwen are siblings marrying cousins, but they are not male/female pairs. Hareth/Haldir/Galdor/Gloredhel are male/female pairs, but I think both pairs are siblibgs, not cousins. Darn it! Fiddling with bits of genealogy, I can only make pieces fit, but not the whole thing. Urwen, you tend to be better at this stuff than I am. Can you spot the pattern? Now your hint about Not Hobbits makes a lot of sense. :D |
Sorry, but I am clueless here too, as both of my guesses were incorrect.
|
I think I have it.
A sister to a brother - Eowyn to Eomer A husband to a wife - Eomer to Lothiriel A daughter to a father - Lothiriel to Imrahil A brother to a sister - Imrahil to Finduilas A mother to a son - Finduilas to Faramir A husband to the first - And Faramir married Eowyn Except that everyone involved met at least once...unless you're trickily referring to he fact that most of them never met Finduilas herself, who died first. |
Quote:
Great teamwork, and sorry it was a bit of a clumsy riddle. Over to you. hS |
Quote:
|
I came to life after the great war
I cared for those who wished to be free Until they denied the westward call Sowing the seeds of their own fall The King, far-seeing one, and his daughter fair Sought to bring change, hiding their despair But their plans were thwarted, their designs put to and end And the rift grew, with no one left to mend The daughter now weeps all alone In a prison which she still calls home And when the end came, unheard went her plea She died with me, and we were finally free |
I think that sounds like a very lovely poetic description of Numenor - the land which was created after the War of Wrath for the Edain. Tar-Palantir and Miriel tried to prevent the Fall, but Miriel was obviously thwarted by Pharazon and later drowned with the island while on her way to pray from Meneltarma.
|
That's it.
|
Bump?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.